1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2.5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II weights approximately 975 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Triumph |
| Model | Silver Cloud II | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6223 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2108 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 64 L |
