1959 Rover P4 vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Korando is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1959 Rover P4. (67 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P4.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Korando (257 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Rover P4. (169 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Rover P4 | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Rover | SsangYong |
Model | P4 | Korando |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 70 L |