1959 Saab 750 vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1964 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 750 would be higher. At 1,147 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Triumph Spitfire is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Triumph Spitfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Triumph Spitfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 750, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Saab 750 | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Saab | Triumph |
Model | 750 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1959 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 748 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2110 mm |