1959 Saab 92 vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1966 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Saab 92 | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Saab | Triumph |
| Model | 92 | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
