1959 Saab 95 vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volkswagen Polo (39 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Saab 95 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Saab 95 (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1959 Saab 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Saab 95 | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Saab | Volkswagen |
Model | 95 | Polo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 841 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 82 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 59 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2340 mm |