1959 Saab 95 vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1959 Saab 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (237 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Saab 95. (82 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Saab 95. 2002 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 1959 Saab 95 has manual transmission. 1959 Saab 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Saab 95 2002 BMW Z3
Make Saab BMW
Model 95 Z3
Year Released 1959 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 841 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 37 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 4250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 82 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73 mm 74.9 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 910 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 4130 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1580 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]