1959 Saab 95 vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (38 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 407 kg more than 1959 Saab 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Saab 95. (84 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Saab 95. 2009 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1959 Saab 95 has manual transmission. 1959 Saab 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Saab 95 | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Saab | Suzuki |
| Model | 95 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 841 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 888 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
