1959 Seat 600 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1375 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Seat 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Seat 600 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Seat | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3270 mm |