1959 Seat 600 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Seat 600 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Seat | Toyota |
| Model | 600 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3270 mm |
