1959 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600.
Because 1959 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Seat 600 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Seat | Holden |
| Model | 600 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
