1959 Seat 600 vs. 2010 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2010 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 2062 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lincoln Navigator (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Seat 600 | 2010 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Seat | Lincoln |
Model | 600 | Navigator |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 575 kg | 2637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1989 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3023 mm |