1959 Skoda 440 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Skoda 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Skoda 440 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1959 Skoda 440. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1959 Skoda 440.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Skoda 440. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 SsangYong Korando (256 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Skoda 440. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Skoda 440.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Skoda 440 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Skoda | SsangYong |
Model | 440 | Korando |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1174 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |