1959 Skoda Octavia vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1959 Skoda Octavia. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1959 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1959 Skoda Octavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Skoda Octavia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Skoda Octavia | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | Octavia | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1959 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 924 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2789 mm |