1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1975 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1975 Zastava 1300 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 340 kg more than 1975 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1975 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Studebaker | Zastava |
Model | Sky Hawk | 1300 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2430 mm |