1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 1996 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 214 kg more than 1996 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 1996 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Studebaker | Volkswagen |
Model | Sky Hawk | Polo |
Year Released | 1959 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2410 mm |