1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Studebaker | Volvo |
Model | Sky Hawk | C70 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2860 mm |