1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,246 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 45 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Studebaker | Toyota |
| Model | Sky Hawk | Camry |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4246 cc | 2360 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2730 mm |
