1959 Triumph Herald vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1963 Zastava 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Zastava 1300 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 Zastava 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Triumph Herald | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Triumph | Zastava |
Model | Herald | 1300 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 947 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 69 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2430 mm |