1959 Triumph Herald vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (35 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 820 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (69 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Triumph Herald | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Triumph | Acura |
| Model | Herald | CL |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 947 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 65 L |
