1959 Triumph Herald vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Triumph Herald | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Triumph | Holden |
Model | Herald | UTE |
Year Released | 1959 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |