1959 Volvo 120 vs. 2005 Zastava 103

To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Volvo 120 (76 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Volvo 120 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Volvo 120 (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.

Compare all specifications: