1959 Volvo 120 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1959 Volvo 120. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1959 Volvo 120.
Because 1959 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Volvo 120 (118 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1959 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Volvo 120 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Volvo | Nissan |
| Model | 120 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2449 mm |
