1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero (91 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C2 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero.
Because 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. (104 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Abarth | Citroen |
Model | 1000 Bialbero | C2 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 7100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 41 L |