1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero (91 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1000 Bialbero | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1000 Bialbero | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
