1960 Abarth 1000 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1000. (87 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1395 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1000 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1000 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 992 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 79 L |
