1960 Abarth 1000 vs. 1981 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1981 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 would be higher. At 992 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 1000 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1981 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1960 Abarth 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1000 | 1981 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Abarth | Autobianchi |
Model | 1000 | A 112 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 992 cc | 965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |