1960 Abarth 1000 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1000. (87 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 470 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1000 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 1000 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 992 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2580 mm |