1960 Abarth 1000 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1000. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1000.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1960 Abarth 1000 has manual transmission. 1960 Abarth 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1000 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1000 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 992 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2490 mm |
