1960 Abarth 1000 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1000. (87 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 620 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Abarth 1000. (96 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Abarth 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1000 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1000 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 992 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 96 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |