1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 900 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Abarth | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 1300 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3135 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2740 mm |
