1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 988 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1300 | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3173 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1618 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 66 L |
