1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1810 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Abarth | Land Rover |
| Model | 1300 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4392 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 282 HP |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 100 L |
