1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3950 cc |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 87 L |