1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 930 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | STS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4565 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 64 L |
