1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1336 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |