1960 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1187 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | XTS |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1280 cc | 3564 cc |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1817 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2831 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |
