1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1949 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1960 Abarth 1600 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 1949 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1600 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3210 mm |
