1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1953 Allard K3
To start off, 1960 Abarth 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,373 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1953 Allard K3 | |
Make | Abarth | Allard |
Model | 1600 | K3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4373 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2550 mm |