1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1953 Austin-Healey 100
To start off, 1960 Abarth 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey 100. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 58 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1953 Austin-Healey 100 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | 1600 | 100 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 948 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 54 L |