1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1959 Austin A 40
To start off, 1960 Abarth 1600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Abarth 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Abarth 1600 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1959 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1959 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1600 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 62.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 26 L |