1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1961 Austin A 60
To start off, 1961 Austin A 60 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1961 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1600 | A 60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 60 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 34 L |