1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1981 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1981 Lincoln Continental is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 965 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 1981 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Abarth | Lincoln |
| Model | 1600 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 101.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2990 mm |
