1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1983 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1983 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 1983 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 190 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 1983 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | Abarth | Buick |
| Model | 1600 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2580 mm |
