1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1997 Kia Clarus
To start off, 1997 Kia Clarus is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Kia Clarus (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Kia Clarus weights approximately 330 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Kia Clarus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1997 Kia Clarus | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 1600 | Clarus |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |