1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 1600 | Elan |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 151 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2270 mm |