1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon

To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,687 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.

Because 1960 Abarth 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Abarth 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Plymouth Neon has automatic transmission and 1960 Abarth 1600 has manual transmission. 1960 Abarth 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Plymouth Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Abarth 1600 2000 Plymouth Neon
Make Abarth Plymouth
Model 1600 Neon
Year Released 1960 2000
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1687 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4170 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1530 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2650 mm