1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2002 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2002 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Terrano II (117 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 860 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2002 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 1600 | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |