1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1384 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Abarth 1600 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | 1600 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 106 L |
