1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2004 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2004 Renault Kangoo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Abarth 1600 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Abarth 1600 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 475 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600.
Because 2004 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Abarth 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2004 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 1600 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 153 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |