1960 Abarth 1600 vs. 2005 Saleen S7
To start off, 2005 Saleen S7 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Abarth 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Abarth 1600 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saleen S7 (750 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 650 more horse power than 1960 Abarth 1600. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1960 Abarth 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saleen S7 weights approximately 357 kg more than 1960 Abarth 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Abarth 1600 | 2005 Saleen S7 | |
Make | Abarth | Saleen |
Model | 1600 | S7 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 750 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 399 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1041 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2692 mm |